HELLO, TEDDY. WE COULD USE YOUR HELP. OR, MAYBE THIS IS AN EXCERCISE IN FUTILITY? IF THE DREAM IS DEAD, WOULD SOMEONE ANNOUCE IT, SO WE CAN STOP WASTING OUR TIME WORKING FOR IT!
THE
GRADUAL
GLOBALISM
PAGE
GRADUAL
OR
EVOLUTIONARY
NOT
MAD-RUSH
EXPLOITIVE
FEBRUARY 21, 2006
AN OPEN APPEAL TO:
1. THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
2. THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
3. THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
4. ALL STATE GOVERNORS
5. AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
TO REVIEW THE CONTEMPORARY NATIONAL STATE OF AFFAIRS WHICH IN REASONABLE PROBABILITY WILL CULMINATE IN
NATIONAL CHAOS
BY CALLING A
CONVENTION OF NATIONAL REASSESSMENT
WE BELIEVE IT NECESSARY FOR THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES TO A CALL A (NON-LEGISLATIVE) CONVENTION OF NATIONAL REASSESSMENT. ITS PURPOSE TO EVALUATE THE VARIOUS ALTERNATIVES TO GUIDE AMERICA IN THE 21ST CENTURY.
[Please, be patient. This essay will be posted in n installments]
The Moral Responsibility of
Every Qualified Economist
To Offer A Potential SOLUTION
To Problematic Globalism???
A TIME FOR BRAINSTORMING
THE
UNRESTRAINED
OUTSOURCING
OF
AMERICA
MISUNDERSTANDING BY
SOME SITE VISITORS
FROM INDIA, THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL
Please read this clarification
Regarding our Gradual Globalism and Outsourcing position.
This site supports limited evolutionary OUTSOURCING to India, The Philippines and third world nations. To help eradiate as much World poverty and suffering as we can. However, we oppose this: Mad-Rush Globalization by international Mega Corporations which relocate to impoverished nations to exploit oppressed slave-waged labor. Once those victims are exhausted, then move on to the next nation leaving behind exploited workers worse off than in the past. Example: U.S. Mega Corporation relocated to Mexico, exploited the impoverished Mexican People, then abruptly relocated to repressive China. Chinese workers paid 25-52 Cents per hour.
Our Gradual Globalism Plan slows down the process. Allows reasonable time for America to readjust its economy. To implement innovative new high tech manufacturing; thereby providing living-wage jobs to our labor force - preserving our MIDDLE-CLASS. This gradual approach ensures, as a participant explained to a Philippine Visitor: "We want you to benefit from a good job created by outsourcing. WE SUPPORT REASONABLE OUTSOURCING. But, we want you to have a job for life; not just 4-5 years. When the mega-corporation abandons your nation to exploit slave-waged workers in China for instance."
Conclusion: As President John F. Kennedy foresaw. Our Site desires ALL BOATS OF ALL PEOPLE OF ALL CLASSES OF ALL NATIONS TO RISE - not just to few - seeking exploitation rather than reasonable return on investment - fair profits
"If you do not manufature anything, you do not have anything to trade!" Recently by an Economist (We apologize for not noting his name)
INCESSANTLY, WE PROMOTE OUR "GRADUAL GLOBALISM PLAN!" WHY?
BLUNTLY, WE STATE THE GRIM REASON: >>>>>>> Has anyone in Washington ever considered this: >>>>>>> WHAT IF >>>>>>> CHINA AND RUSSIA FORM "An Economic Union" SIMILAR to our 'GRADUAL GLOBALISM PLAN?" Subsequently, what if, India integrates??? HELLO??? WELL, IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND BY NOW; perhaps we should outsource ALL OF AMERICA.
A public appeal for a nonpartisan Blue Ribbon Commission investigating impending deterioration of US economic power and prosperity.
"WHO AM I??? ANYONE WHO SUCCEEDS , YET FORGETS THE BACKGROUND FROM WHENCE THEY CAME, IGNORES IT, OR HIDES IT IN SHAME; FORGETS WHO THEY ARE; BECOMING LOST AND CONFUSED, NO LONGER SURE-FOOTED UNABLE TO DETERMINE THE CORRECT PATH ON WHICH TO TRAVERSE." The Philosopher"
BY A JOINT PRESIDENTIAL-CONGRESSIONAL DECLARATION
FOR A ONE-YEAR PUBLIC DEBATE
REGARDING RESEARCHING
ESCALATING EXPORTATION OF:
US MANUFACTURING - MEANS OF PRODUCTION AND SERVICES
AS IMPACTING THE GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT
AND
STANDARD OF LIVING
OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
"THE ECONOMIST" for The Liberal News (tm)
"There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why ... I dream of things that never were, and ask why not? " ROBERT F. KENNEDY - From George B. Shaw
REQUESTING CHAIRMAN ALAN GREENSPAN'S ECONOMIC LEADERSHIP
"We call upon Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan (an economics genius and man of the highest integrity) to support establishment of the following BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION. In conjunction with the President and Congress, to provide the necessary leadership for a scholarly investigation of the future viability of the US economy; recommending specific public policy to maintain and promote: living -wage employment; Middle-Class's preservation, and, particularly, retention of younger generation's IT Tech jobs.
"If GRADUAL GLOBALISM, and its first phase CMA+RU, is a Pipedream, then, it is PRESIDENT JOHN FITZGERAL KENNEDY'S Pipedream. America may have lost its innocence, but it can regain its vision. See: Excerpts from JFK's inaugural Address to be included below." "the"
********************************************
A PROPOSAL:
TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICA'S FREE TRADE PARADIGM INTO
"THE EUROPEAN UNION" and THE REMAINING GLOBAL COMMUNITY
----------------------------------------------
INDEX OF ISSUES:
PROLOGUE
A HISTORIC TIME FOR DECISION-MAKING WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? WE OFFER A PREVENTATIVE PROPOSAL:
A NEW FORM OF
"GRADUAL" GLOBALISM
THE CMA+RU equals ''GRADUAL" GLOBALISM
EXACTLY WHAT IS CMA+RU?
A RUDIMENTARY ECONOMIC RATIONALE:
WHY IS RUSSIASIBERIA-UKRAINE NECESSARY?
THE POTENTIAL ECONOMIC REWARDS?
AN ENORMOUS IMPEDIMENT EXISTS:
THE BERING STRAITS BARRIER -
CAN IT BE CONQUERED?
THE NEXT STAGE -
INTEGRATION WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION
FINAL PHASE-
INTEGRATION WITH THE REMAINING GLOBAL COMMUNITY
(Remember India and China are Contiguous to Siberia.)
AN EPILOGUE
IS CMA+RU - AN ECONOMIC PIPEDREAM?
WHAT WOULD JFK THINK???
EXCERPTS FROM: PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY'S INAUGURAL ADDRESS January 1961
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?
PROLOGUE
A HISTORIC TIME FOR DECISION-MAKING
Since the late 1960s, a gradual, insidious and pernicious deterioration in the American Middle-Class standard of living has occurred. According to per capital income apportionment and DISTRIBUTION compared to aggregate GDP - The Middle-Class standard of living should have doubled even tripled. Obviously, this his not been the case. To the contrary, unbeknownst to most , a vast exportations of manufacturing (all important means of production, US capital investment and Middle-Class Wealth) WAS transferred to: Europe Japan Korea etc. Promoting these first world nations prosperity at the expense of the US middle-class; and especially the poor. In effect, the Marshall Plan never ended.
Under the erroneous semblance of purported free trade, The USA permitted foreign competitors unrestricted access to its lucrative market place. ON THE OTHER HAND, foreign nations did not equitably reciprocate. Disallowing the equivalent comprehensive entire to their markets. In fact, they constrained access; ingeniously utilizing unfair trade practices (and ourtright PROTECTIONISM) to thwart our products entry. The result? Foreign imports flooded the US market, US exports plummeted. Of course, this, in turn, caused gigantic US TRADE DEFICITS. $500 Billion this year alone. In effect, "A Great Middle-Class Wealth Giveaway" transpired. Consumers, looking for the best price, purchased imports; thereby exporting further capital to foreign nations. Eventually this produced a continuing but immense exportation US manufacturing jobs. Entire industries for that matter.
All economists could clearly forecast this ultimate calamitous injury to the Middle-Class standard of living. Some engaged themselves in THE BUY AMERICAN MOVEMENT. This appeal to patriotism was futile. In horror, they watched as one US industry after another; either, failed, or simply capitulated ("surrendered") substantial US market share.
Other US economists and politicians (beholding to colossal corporate campaign contributions) blindly adhered to an antiquated, dubious ill-defined FREE TRADE PARADIGM. This prototype never produced the MUTUAL RECIPROCAL "TWO-WAY-STREET" free and fair trade anticipated. Instead one-way-street trade ruled inuring to the benefit of foreign nations. The consequence? An enormous US Economy loss - to the detriment of the Middle-Class and working poor. Nafta, WTO (currently FTAA) and multiple bilateral trade agreements --- aggravated the dilemma.
Currently, this perilous economic situation is exacerbated by the astonishing, rapid, enormous US and European multinational corporations' investments in developing third world economies. In particular China, India, and other disadvantaged third-world nations. This investment was not undertaken in a spirit beneficent humanitarianism, rather, as some depict it, as a 21st century neo-colonialism. Multinational Corporate Monopolies overtly exploit such for the profit motive ("taking advantage of the disadvantaged"). That is: the discounted workforce (some slave-waged - even child labor) to immensely diminish their labor expenditure; thereby greatly escalating their earnings. Some describe this as profiteering. The result? Forcing US wages downward in a ''THE RACE TO THE BOTTOM''.
This shortsighted short-term gain, in all probability, will trigger in long-term pain. By continuing unabated, these Multinationals embarked upon a hazardous economic path. All done without comprehensive economic consideration of potential long-term damaging consequences. Which, in all probability, will mushroom out of control unraveling our nation's fundamental principles. Thus, portending a cataclysmic risk to US peace and prosperity. The ruination of the American Middle-Class and the American Dream?
Presently, the blatant jobs exportation designated as "outsourcing," [especially of well-paying IT service jobs] - stunned the ever-increasing jobless, downsized or forcibly early-retireds. This is illustrated by the major "JOBS" issue supremacy in the 2004 Election. Unquestionably, a social and political backlash never before seen in America will emerge.
As one observer candidly declared, "You can't tell a middle-class individual he or she must now become poor. Or, as Clinton repeatedly warned, 'This next generation will not do as well as their parents' generation.' In other words, Clinton's code words warned, in effect, the next generation better be prepared to enroll either in the lower-middle-class or the working poor. This simply won't flush in the American political arena. Eventually, as more Americans become "the long-term jobless," or working for decreasing wages, things will reach a boiling point. There will be vociferous demands for Protectionism. Frightened politicians will buckle under the pressure. Once comprehensive protectionism commences, international economic and political instability will give birth to trade wars. Looming on the horizon is the probability of eventual international political confrontation. Once started, a catastrophe of global proportions can plunge humanity into irreversible discord. 'We have searched for the enemy, and found, it was us.' Pogo."
THEREFORE,
WE RESPECTFULLY RECOMMEND:
A PREVENTATIVE PROPOSAL:
A NEW FORM OF:
''GRADUAL" GLOBALISM
VIA
THE NORMATIVE PROCESSES OF
FREE ENTERPRISE CAPITALISM
In the spirit goodwill, not seeking conflict nor controversy, we propose a new free trade GLOBALISM paradigm designated ''GRADUAL" GLOBALISM. A historic time has arrived for open public debate, reconsideration and reanalysis of this issue by: US business, Multinationals, the government and the People. An opportunity for all to participate in the decision-making process which will influence the remainder of our lives, global stability and posterity. The proposal is as follows -
The CMA+RU
- EQUALS -
GRADUAL GLOBALISM
EXACTLY WHAT IS CMA+RU?
In its first phase, CMA+RU will be an international economic union; initially encompassing all qualifying Western Hemisphere nations of: South, North, Central, Caribbean America. It is an open invitation for them to voluntarily join in a comprehensive economic integration with each other. Concurrently, CMA+RU'S second stage will entail a request RussiaSiberia and Ukraine to prepare and apply for eventual voluntary unification into the economic integration processes. As the first two strata near culmination, the European Union will be requested to integrate. Thereafter, the same incorporation process will be made available to the remainder of the Global economic community.
PREREQUISITES FOR
ELIGIBILITY AND INCLUSION
First, all applying Nation States' acceptance for inclusion will be decided by accomplishing the eligibility requirements. Prerequisites very similar, if not exactly the same, as those mandates necessary for entry into the European Common Market. Specifically the application, enforcement and realization of basic fundamental humanitarian standards. Basic social, political, economic, human rights for their citizens founded upon democratic principles secured by the rule of law. For instance, upgrading the standard of living of their poor by establishment and enforcement a minimum wage. Other Nation States not in full compliance with these standards could be permitted a limited participation progressively amalgamated into the union. Subsequently, gaining full membership status, and CMA+RU benefits.
SOME UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES
SUPPORTING
CMA+RU's ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY:
Feasibility, and long-term success, of the fledgling CMA+RU, is interconnected with countless fortuitous global characteristics:
(1) concentration of massive, yet untapped, natural and human resources;
(2) the geographic proximity; especially the geographic contiguous and accessible nature of these resources;
(3) bolstered by, uncomplicated applicability of economies of scale and prompt amalgamation of all vital merged elements;
(4) most importantly, the convenience of the gargantuan capital investment required;
(5) The Nation States' compliance constructing demand production economies, founded upon unfettered free market capitalism (free enterprise); and
(6) the yet undiscovered affluence of "The New Age of Technology and Invention" currently unfolding;
(7) that is, scientific research and invention of new techniques triggering more proficient manufacturing of: plant, equipment, products and services. These are but a few, nevertheless, sufficient economic realities to ensure CMA+RU's feasibility and success.
CMA+RU ="GRADUAL" GLOBALISM'S ECONOMIC REWARDS:
INCALCULABLE
[BY EVERY STUDY UNDERTAKEN]
CMA+RU AND "GRADUAL" GLOBALISM
will:
usher in a global prosperity equating to a 21st Century Economic Renaissance. Enormous economic rewards of: wealth creation, abundance and enhanced standards of living are limitless; and, inestimable - never before imagined on Planet Earth.
Why?
Simply because never has a commercial, mercantile, trade, industrial venture/enterprise been attempted on such a multi-national, multi-continental scale. Never has CAPITALISTIC growth opportunity-potential been available to ENRICH so many. Not by utilization of capitalism's negative downside - exploitation methodologies. Not victimization by predatory competition. No longer will the oligarchic few PREY ON THE MANY - today, disadvantaging 5 billion of Earth's inhabitants. TO THE CONTRARY, for first time, under GRADUAL GLOBALISM, by utilization of POSITIVE CAPITALISM, [capitalistic cooperation WHICH HAS ENRICHED WESTERN CIVILIZATION] - will benefit all of Mankind.
Where has Capitalism been so used? The USA. For example, creation of the American Middle-Class-The American Dream. But more importantly, within the inherent beneficent capitalistic concept of INCORPORATION. In effect, CMA+RU-GRADUAL GLOBALISM will be the giant multinational corporation; each participating Nation State will be investor-stockholders. The latter will enjoy the profits created. In other words, GRADUAL GLOBALISM will eventually "incorporate mankind" by cooperative bountiful capitalism. Giving reality to Francis of Assisi's words, "You can catch more flies with a spoon of honey, than with a barrel of vinegar."
When will such enrichment-rewards occur? As soon as man applies himself - earns it. Accomplishment is in the doing. (See: Goethe) Nevertheless, from the outset, the INITIAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT ALONE in CMA+RU's primary formation will ignite a profusion of economic activity garnering cornucopia of incalculable ABUNDANCE. Thereafter, annual incrementals will yield amplified investment earnings-return; in conjunction with living-wage job creation. Over the long run, global amalgamation, will guarantee high standards of living for all participant Nation States - mankind - not just a few. Individual citizens benefit twofold: once from wage/salary; and, secondly from their Nation State's profit return.
On the other hand,
for the cynics and naysayers, what is the risk? The risk of failure? Trite but true - "Nothing ventured, nothing gained." In any event, "Life is risk." However, it is better to assume risk on the high probability of GRADUAL- GLOBALISM'S success potential (which far outweighs the possibility of failure) - than to do nothing. The peace benefit and international political stability is remarkable. As one observer stated, "People don't go to war when they're working together to make money."
WHY IS RUSSIA-SIBERIA-UKRAINE NECESSARY?
CMA, by itself, can generate Western Hemisphere Nation States' prosperity for a historic period. Nevertheless, the addition of RussiaSiberia and Ukraine into the equation, establishes an authentic prospect of an Epoch of Global Prosperity. (Of course, the geographic contiguousness of RussiaSiberia and Ukraine is an absolute imperative for successive European Union and Global integration. )
Otherwise, why request Ukraine's participation? Ukraine possesses The Black Earth - the most productive planetary soil. With Ukraine, as one of CMA+RU'S major breadbaskets, combined with the America' agricultural resources, hunger can be eradicated.
But, most importantly, the real CMA+RU prosperity stimulus focuses around RussiaSiberia participation. Because, RussiaSiberia possesses the maximum concentration of natural resources unparalleled anywhere on the Globe. Nevertheless, RUSSIAN/SIBERIA'S predicament has been impenetrability of resource extraction and utilization. Due to the harsh frigid Siberian climate. As single nation, Russia MAY never abundantly enjoy the prosperity benefits locked in Siberia. However, as a CMA+RU Nation State, in unison, all participants can conquer the weather problem.
This raises the question of environmentally-safe resource extractability? For instance, Brazil's Amazon region contains the maximum easily-accessible and extractable natural resources worldwide. However, the current extraction methodology presents a planetary environmental cataclysm. This disaster can be averted by the employment of all CMA+RU participants. Salvaging The Earth's oxygen supply; while allowing Brazil's the prosperity it deserves.
In both cases, the challenge can be further resolved. By enormous capital investment into practical scientific research and development. We designate this as "The 100 Year Technological Leap Forward." A new age of EDISONIAN INVENTION and practical technical application.
(Subsequent essays describe this with specificity.)
HOWEVER???
AN ENORMOUS IMPEDIMENT EXISTS:
THE BERING STRAITS
CAN ENGINEERING CONQUER THEM? YES!
A monumental geographic impediment; and, epic engineering challenge confront CMA+RU-GRADUAL GLOBALISM --- The Bering Straits of Alaska and Russia. This blocks the contiguous worldwide linkage crucial for CMA+RU-GRADUAL GLOBALISM'S success. Central to viability, is the tangible connection of the two continents. Unquestionably, economics and commercial necessities. The aspiration of intertwining The Earth and All Mankind as one cohesive economic entity would be shattered; due to unattainable global economic integration.
Regarding The Bering Straits, Engineering experts' opinions range from "conquest is impossible " to enthusiastic "probable, but the most gargantuan engineering challenge of the 21st Century." The latter group represents the majority consensus, although they maintain no illusions. Recommending two engineering methodologies:
(1) The Herculean task of bridging (constantly exposed to) the most hazardous global ocean environment; or,
(2) tunneling underneath.
Tunneling would correspond, but be geometrically more problematic than channeling the UK and EU. (Without which, the EU was doomed.) Ultimately, the majority viewpoint favors tunneling. (Subsequent to extensive engineering feasibility inquiries.) In actuality, two tunnels are proposed each consisting of four lanes. Two dedicated for commercial train-transport of resources and passengers. A third lane dedicated to trucking; and, the fourth modified for safe vehicular traffic. This composite view is : "If you are going to build it, do it once and do it right - from the beginning - structurally design it for imminent future advancements.".
All agree, both methodologies are enormously expensive. Nevertheless, financially well-worth the Nation States' investment. Since the investment earnings would be astronomical. Once constructed, either method will create an continuous copious "treasure of enrichment;" accompanied by highly lucrative capitalist returns. Initial capital investment itself will trigger immense employment opportunities for national participants. An additional benefit is: the volume of cost recovery and maintenance expenditures remunerated by user fee revenues. In the end, the overwhelming majority of engineers concur, the prospect is ---the Straits can be conquered? It boils down to a matter of vision, will, and persistent tenacity. (Discussed hereafter)
Furthermore, supplementary practical commercial realities need to be addressed. For Instance, the critical systemic requirement of TRANSPORT VELOCITY of intercontinental human and natural resources. Transit time is essential to financial success. Trite but true, "Time is money." The pace must be: unimpeded, swift and reliably prompt. The preeminent scientific-practical mode is train-transport. Which can generate speeds in the 100s MPH. Newer technological advancements; such as, mag-lev trains, augur higher speeds and efficiency. Therefore, experts categorize transport means as follows:
(1) primarily high-speed train-transport,
(2) secondly, high-speed TRUCKING, (emphasizing fusion of truck-trailers and ocean shipping-containers within a uniform train-transport system), and
(3) lastly passenger vehicular traffic.
Upon CMA+RU participants' completion
of their transportation upgrades, in time, land commerce will expeditiously journey from Tierra del Fuego to Ukraine. (Amazingly, for the first period in history, MAN will achieve unimpeded land transport throughout the globe. Incredibly, an individual could drive his or her car around the interconnected Planet.) All of this, without the inherent vulnerability, lethargy and uncertain reliability of frequently hazardous ocean shipping. Presently, the sole inefficient method for massive international trade.
All the aforementioned, are indispensable for adroit, vivacious, effective, efficient global ECONOMIC INTEGRATION.
THE NEXT STAGE:
INVITATION FOR
EUROPEAN UNION INTEGRATION
The next stage will be invitation from CMA+RU to the EU for equitable integration - amalgamating both Unions. Perhaps, this merger would be identified as "THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC UNION."
FINAL PHASES:
INVITATION FOR INTEGRATION WITH
THE REMAINING GLOBAL COMMUNITY
(Commencing with India and China which are contiguous to Siberia)
The residual phases of GLOBAL INTEGRATION will commence with invitation to India and China for their simultaneous equitable integration within "THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC UNION." Please Note: THE GRADUAL GLOBALISM PARADIGM was not formulated intending omission of these; or any other nation. To the contrary, China's and India's fortuitous geographic contiguous bordering with Siberia facilitates their inclusion.
Thereafter,
the remainder of the world's nations integration; such as, continental Africa, can commence. [What about non-contiguous nations, such as, Japan? Start tunneling. Now!] The Final Result? All mankind, to the exclusion of none, can participate in earning their share of Global prosperity.
PRESIDENT JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY: If CMA+RU-GRADUAL GLOBALISM IS AN ECONOMIC PIPEDREAM, THEN IT IS PRESIDENT JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY'S PIPE DREAM. THE CONCEPTUALIZED PARADIGM HEREIN WAS DESIGNED FROM HIS NEW FRONTIER.
A few respected expert economists intensely criticize CMA+RU's viability. Their assessment views it as unattainable - unrealistic idealism - political rhetoric. Their perception? CMA+RU-GRADUAL GLOBALISM is inherently flawed. In that: no matter how sound the economic proposals; it is doomed. It will not attract the indispensable nations' participation. Why? Presently, such countries control the Free Trade advantage - buttressed by the multinational corporations.
We Respectfully Disagree.
Our judgment being:
International Nation States' internal conflict, caused by the current paradigm, will compel their leaders to search for a substitute Globalism prototype. This will be a structure roughly similar to GRADUAL GLOBALISM. Although ostensibly unconventional (in comparison to the CONTEMPORARY free trade paradigm); to the contrary, it is not.
Why? The European Union is successful - more or less accurately matching the model presented herein.
Furthermore,
CMA+RU-GRADUAL GLOBALISM represents an improved feasible and achievable option. Why? Not only due to its intrinsic profitability; but also, it offers Earth's inhabitants something not currently possessed, but needed - HOPE. A hope-filled attainable equitable goal - for a potentially enhanced standard of living. The probability of comprehensive future prosperity - without warfare.
No, GRADUAL GLOBALISM does not guarantee success.
Nevertheless, it does offer the opportunity for individual and Nation State prosperity - in correlation to the degree of meritorious applied labor. As one observer confirmed, "Something to believe in and work toward. A moral economic imperative for future peace and prosperity guaranteeing the opportunity for an equitable share for all - without the few preying upon the many. Where, the odds are, in the not too distant future, poverty will become non-existent. Thereby, ensuring worldwide peace and stability."
Nevertheless, ultimately, GRADUAL GLOBALISM'S realization is more psychologically dependant. The concept merges into whether or not international leaders and their peoples will seize "THE VISION" and possess "THE WILL." "WILL" implying, in times of difficulty, the necessary tenacity - perseverance/endurance - to remain focused upon goal achievement. If for no other reason than their capitalistic financial self-interest. If so, then the present global trade mentality can be transformed. A optimistic fresh vision - a new global frontier, so to speak of "GRADUAL DEMOCRATIC CAPITALISM- GLOBALISM" can usher in the "21ST CENTURY'S GLOBAL ECONOMIC RENAISSANCE."
JFK'S NEW FRONTIER:
"You can kill a good man, but you can never kill his good ideas. America lost its innocence, but not its vision." "The Philosopher" The intellectual design for CMA+RU-GRADUAL GLOBALISM was generated by an extrapolation of JFK'S New Frontier principles. Which the authors synthesized into practical achievable global economic goals.
EXCERPTS FROM
PRESIDENT JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY'S
Inaugural Address January, 1961
(DISCLAIMER: For the purpose of getting to the heart its multi-layered meanings, The Address is presented in a juxtaposed, truncated fashion, utilizing space-saving block form - without quotation marks.)
... We observe today ..... a celebration of freedom ... signifying ... change. ... ... the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe ... the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God. ... We ... are the heirs of that first revolution. ... proud of our ancient heritage ... and unwilling to ... permit the slow undoing of those human rights ... at home and around the world. ... The world is very different ... now. ... man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of ... poverty ... and ... human life. To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. We shall not always expect ... them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom ... United there is little we cannot do ..... Divided there is little we can do - for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder. ... To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge--to convert our good words into good deeds--in a new alliance for progress--to assist ... free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. ... But ... [in] ... this peaceful revolution .... Let all our neighbors know ... we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. ... [This] Hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house. ... we shall ...oppose any foe to assure... the success of liberty. ... The graves of young Americans ... surround the globe. ... each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. ..., only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. .... In your hands, ... will rest the final success or failure .... [in] ... a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease and war itself.... [Let us] forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind?... ask not what your country can do for you--ask what you can do for your country. ... to those ... who ... make themselves our adversary, we ... request: ... anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers ... engulf all humanity in... self-destruction.... . ...let us never fear ... let us explore .... a new world of law, where the strong are just and the weak secure and the peace preserved. ... . To those people ...of ... the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, ... because it is right. ... [So] ... citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do ... . If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. ..., All this will not be finished ... in our lifetime.... But let us begin., .... let us go forth ... asking His blessing ... knowing ... on earth God's work must truly be our own.
EPILOGUE
("It is not for us to pray to The Father - to do it, He placed us here for The Good's accomplishment. Endowing us with two gifts - INTELLECT - the capacity to think and create, and FREE WILL - the WILL to achieve what we deliberate and judge to be THE GOOD. Our life - society - resides in our hands; not others. As The Master's Brother James 'The Just' of Jerusalem' declared, 'Let us not be mere LISTENERS about 'THE WAY;' rather, Brothers, let us be DOERS.' of the Judeo-Christian-Islamic Ethos." "The Theologian" and "The Philosopher")
EPILOGUE
EPILOGUE ("It is not for us to pray to The Father - to do it, He placed us here for The Good's accomplishment. Endowing us with two gifts - INTELLECT - the capacity to think and create, and FREE WILL - the WILL to achieve what we deliberate and judge to be THE GOOD. Our life - society - resides in our hands; not others. As The Master's Brother James 'The Just' of Jerusalem' declared, 'Let us not be mere LISTENERS about 'THE WAY;' rather, Brothers, let us be DOERS.' of the Judeo-Christian-Islamic Ethos." "The Theologian" and "The Philosopher")
Respectfully Submitted,
"The Economist" with "The International Relations Professor"
Ths Cynic: "So, this is how some people get their happiness..."
THOMAS FRIEDMAN'S BOOK: "The World Is Flat" We have not yet read it. However, his economic presentation is excellent. Our Concerns: 1. What are his conclusions regarding how FLATNESS will devastate America? 2. Most Importantly, what are his SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTIONS to avoid this disaster.? Generalizations? Unacceptable. We are speaking of the end of the USA as we know it. Serious problems demand serious SPECIFIC COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTIONS to be recommended.
"Tom. We honor your intellect. Admire your work. However, obviously, America is in serious trouble. But what do you recommend to preserve: the Nation, our Standard of Living, and Way of Life???" All of Us
EXCITING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ANNOUNCEMENT 9/13/05
The Economist never shows emotion. [Makes Greenspan look like a comedian] However, when a Chamber of Commerce spokesman 9/13/05 began"questioning and even, to some degree, criticizing" pseudo-free-trade with China, he was moved. "After all these years, I think The Chamber understands phony-free-trade means the death of small business in the USA. Without small business, we cannot rebuild America. It employs most of our people. It is the most creative economic element in society. So, let us pray. If the U.S. Chamber of Commerce [and fighters like its CHAIRMAN TOM DONAHUE (sp) join us], we can save this country. We will not be defeated! Yes. We can rebuild A New America for the 21st Century. This is the happiest day of my life."